Varför Hijab? Why Hijab? - English sub Swedish
Varför Hijab?
En kortfilm där ett par muslimska tjejer berättar sin syn på den muslimska huvudbonaden - Hijab. Med svenska undertexter....
Varför Hijab?
En kortfilm där ett par muslimska tjejer berättar sin syn på den muslimska huvudbonaden - Hijab. Med svenska undertexter.
Why Hijab?
A short film where a couple of Muslim girls, says his views on Muslim headgear - Hijab. With Swedish subtitles.
6m:14s
7905
Mokhtarnameh - Avsnitt 01 - Det vita slottet - Farsi sub Swedish
I Guds den Nåderikes den Barmhärtiges Namn
I Hans Namn som försåg hjärna och hjärta med logik
Mokhtar Thaqafi, även kallad Abu Ishaq,...
I Guds den Nåderikes den Barmhärtiges Namn
I Hans Namn som försåg hjärna och hjärta med logik
Mokhtar Thaqafi, även kallad Abu Ishaq, son till Abu Ubayd Thaqafi; hans far ökänd som en av erövrarna av det oövervinneliga persiska riket och han själv beryktad och respekterad utav egen bedrift för sitt mod, medvetenhet och politiska skarpsinne och dessutom högaktad bland så väl araber som iranier som inte sällan var oense sinsemellan.
Lät hjärnans logik få övertaget under Imam Hassans(A) tid och höll sig i utkanterna, bort från den starkt politiskt manipulerade arenan. I efterhand, och efter Imam Hassans(A) martyrskap, fastän läget tett sig som han själv beräknat, insåg han sitt misstag av att inte ha lyssnat till hjärtats logik och försökte återgälda genom att stå Imam Hossein(A) till tjänst; men nu var det inte minst ödet som kom emellan och hade annat i förvar för honom.
Det är en svårfångad mystiskt och svårbegriplig känsla som inte kan hjälpas att kännas rätt över denna personlighet. En känsla som må vara svårt att lägga fingret på och än mer svårtolkad men som desto mer fångar in och lämnar intryck på ett djupare plan.
Hjärnans logik, som är bunden till att begripa först när alla pusselbitar är synligt på plats, har svårt att greppa den sanning som ändå känns av och att enbart försöka begripa det på den nivån till att börja med kommer vara en ansträngning med föga resultat; för att ha en chans att förstå Mokhtar och hans revolution, se med hjärtats logik!
Mokhtarname är en nyproducerad filmserie i vacker tappning, baserad på ett historiskt verklighetstroget, till namnet, känd händelse vars bakgrund och händelseförlopp är mindre känd. Filmserien återger det historiska händelseförloppet baserat på tillförlitliga historieskildringar och för att möjliggöra att en större publik får del av historien, följer varje avsnitt undertextad på svenska.
Håll utkik för kommande avsnitt
60m:59s
20486
Mokhtarnameh - Avsnitt 08 - De fastkedjade lejonen - Farsi sub Swedish
I Guds den Nåderikes den Barmhärtiges Namn
I Hans Namn som försåg hjärna och hjärta med logik
Mokhtar Thaqafi, även kallad Abu Ishaq,...
I Guds den Nåderikes den Barmhärtiges Namn
I Hans Namn som försåg hjärna och hjärta med logik
Mokhtar Thaqafi, även kallad Abu Ishaq, son till Abu Ubayd Thaqafi; hans far ökänd som en av erövrarna av det oövervinneliga persiska riket och han själv beryktad och respekterad utav egen bedrift för sitt mod, medvetenhet och politiska skarpsinne och dessutom högaktad bland så väl araber som iranier som inte sällan var oense sinsemellan.
Lät hjärnans logik få övertaget under Imam Hassans(A) tid och höll sig i utkanterna, bort från den starkt politiskt manipulerade arenan. I efterhand, och efter Imam Hassans(A) martyrskap, fastän läget tett sig som han själv beräknat, insåg han sitt misstag av att inte ha lyssnat till hjärtats logik och försökte återgälda genom att stå Imam Hossein(A) till tjänst; men nu var det inte minst ödet som kom emellan och hade annat i förvar för honom.
Det är en svårfångad mystiskt och svårbegriplig känsla som inte kan hjälpas att kännas rätt över denna personlighet. En känsla som må vara svårt att lägga fingret på och än mer svårtolkad men som desto mer fångar in och lämnar intryck på ett djupare plan.
Hjärnans logik, som är bunden till att begripa först när alla pusselbitar är synligt på plats, har svårt att greppa den sanning som ändå känns av och att enbart försöka begripa det på den nivån till att börja med kommer vara en ansträngning med föga resultat; för att ha en chans att förstå Mokhtar och hans revolution, se med hjärtats logik!
Mokhtarname är en nyproducerad filmserie i vacker tappning, baserad på ett historiskt verklighetstroget, till namnet, känd händelse vars bakgrund och händelseförlopp är mindre känd. Filmserien återger det historiska händelseförloppet baserat på tillförlitliga historieskildringar och för att möjliggöra att en större publik får del av historien, följer varje avsnitt undertextad på svenska.
Håll utkik för kommande avsnitt
56m:43s
11054
Mokhtarnameh - Avsnitt 17 - Himlens gäst - Farsi sub Swedish
I Guds den Nåderikes den Barmhärtiges Namn
I Hans Namn som försåg hjärna och hjärta med logik
Mokhtar Thaqafi, även kallad Abu Ishaq,...
I Guds den Nåderikes den Barmhärtiges Namn
I Hans Namn som försåg hjärna och hjärta med logik
Mokhtar Thaqafi, även kallad Abu Ishaq, son till Abu Ubayd Thaqafi; hans far ökänd som en av erövrarna av det oövervinneliga persiska riket och han själv beryktad och respekterad utav egen bedrift för sitt mod, medvetenhet och politiska skarpsinne och dessutom högaktad bland så väl araber som iranier som inte sällan var oense sinsemellan.
Lät hjärnans logik få övertaget under Imam Hassans(A) tid och höll sig i utkanterna, bort från den starkt politiskt manipulerade arenan. I efterhand, och efter Imam Hassans(A) martyrskap, fastän läget tett sig som han själv beräknat, insåg han sitt misstag av att inte ha lyssnat till hjärtats logik och försökte återgälda genom att stå Imam Hossein(A) till tjänst; men nu var det inte minst ödet som kom emellan och hade annat i förvar för honom.
Det är en svårfångad mystiskt och svårbegriplig känsla som inte kan hjälpas att kännas rätt över denna personlighet. En känsla som må vara svårt att lägga fingret på och än mer svårtolkad men som desto mer fångar in och lämnar intryck på ett djupare plan.
Hjärnans logik, som är bunden till att begripa först när alla pusselbitar är synligt på plats, har svårt att greppa den sanning som ändå känns av och att enbart försöka begripa det på den nivån till att börja med kommer vara en ansträngning med föga resultat; för att ha en chans att förstå Mokhtar och hans revolution, se med hjärtats logik!
Mokhtarname är en nyproducerad filmserie i vacker tappning, baserad på ett historiskt verklighetstroget, till namnet, känd händelse vars bakgrund och händelseförlopp är mindre känd. Filmserien återger det historiska händelseförloppet baserat på tillförlitliga historieskildringar och för att möjliggöra att en större publik får del av historien, följer varje avsnitt undertextad på svenska.
Håll utkik för kommande avsnitt
54m:55s
29242
Mokhtarnameh - Avsnitt 30 - Fågelskrämman - Farsi sub Swedish
I Guds den Nåderikes den Barmhärtiges Namn
I Hans Namn som försåg hjärna och hjärta med logik
Mokhtar Thaqafi, även kallad Abu Ishaq,...
I Guds den Nåderikes den Barmhärtiges Namn
I Hans Namn som försåg hjärna och hjärta med logik
Mokhtar Thaqafi, även kallad Abu Ishaq, son till Abu Ubayd Thaqafi; hans far ökänd som en av erövrarna av det oövervinneliga persiska riket och han själv beryktad och respekterad utav egen bedrift för sitt mod, medvetenhet och politiska skarpsinne och dessutom högaktad bland så väl araber som iranier som inte sällan var oense sinsemellan.
Lät hjärnans logik få övertaget under Imam Hassans(A) tid och höll sig i utkanterna, bort från den starkt politiskt manipulerade arenan. I efterhand, och efter Imam Hassans(A) martyrskap, fastän läget tett sig som han själv beräknat, insåg han sitt misstag av att inte ha lyssnat till hjärtats logik och försökte återgälda genom att stå Imam Hossein(A) till tjänst; men nu var det inte minst ödet som kom emellan och hade annat i förvar för honom.
Det är en svårfångad mystiskt och svårbegriplig känsla som inte kan hjälpas att kännas rätt över denna personlighet. En känsla som må vara svårt att lägga fingret på och än mer svårtolkad men som desto mer fångar in och lämnar intryck på ett djupare plan.
Hjärnans logik, som är bunden till att begripa först när alla pusselbitar är synligt på plats, har svårt att greppa den sanning som ändå känns av och att enbart försöka begripa det på den nivån till att börja med kommer vara en ansträngning med föga resultat; för att ha en chans att förstå Mokhtar och hans revolution, se med hjärtats logik!
Mokhtarname är en nyproducerad filmserie i vacker tappning, baserad på ett historiskt verklighetstroget, till namnet, känd händelse vars bakgrund och händelseförlopp är mindre känd. Filmserien återger det historiska händelseförloppet baserat på tillförlitliga historieskildringar och för att möjliggöra att en större publik får del av historien, följer varje avsnitt undertextad på svenska.
Håll utkik för kommande avsnitt
55m:54s
11441
Mokhtarnameh - Avsnitt 39 - Dödandet av jätten - Farsi sub Swedish
I Guds den Nåderikes den Barmhärtiges Namn
I Hans Namn som försåg hjärna och hjärta med logik
Mokhtar Thaqafi, även kallad Abu Ishaq,...
I Guds den Nåderikes den Barmhärtiges Namn
I Hans Namn som försåg hjärna och hjärta med logik
Mokhtar Thaqafi, även kallad Abu Ishaq, son till Abu Ubayd Thaqafi; hans far ökänd som en av erövrarna av det oövervinneliga persiska riket och han själv beryktad och respekterad utav egen bedrift för sitt mod, medvetenhet och politiska skarpsinne och dessutom högaktad bland så väl araber som iranier som inte sällan var oense sinsemellan.
Lät hjärnans logik få övertaget under Imam Hassans(A) tid och höll sig i utkanterna, bort från den starkt politiskt manipulerade arenan. I efterhand, och efter Imam Hassans(A) martyrskap, fastän läget tett sig som han själv beräknat, insåg han sitt misstag av att inte ha lyssnat till hjärtats logik och försökte återgälda genom att stå Imam Hossein(A) till tjänst; men nu var det inte minst ödet som kom emellan och hade annat i förvar för honom.
Det är en svårfångad mystiskt och svårbegriplig känsla som inte kan hjälpas att kännas rätt över denna personlighet. En känsla som må vara svårt att lägga fingret på och än mer svårtolkad men som desto mer fångar in och lämnar intryck på ett djupare plan.
Hjärnans logik, som är bunden till att begripa först när alla pusselbitar är synligt på plats, har svårt att greppa den sanning som ändå känns av och att enbart försöka begripa det på den nivån till att börja med kommer vara en ansträngning med föga resultat; för att ha en chans att förstå Mokhtar och hans revolution, se med hjärtats logik!
Mokhtarname är en nyproducerad filmserie i vacker tappning, baserad på ett historiskt verklighetstroget, till namnet, känd händelse vars bakgrund och händelseförlopp är mindre känd. Filmserien återger det historiska händelseförloppet baserat på tillförlitliga historieskildringar och för att möjliggöra att en större publik får del av historien, följer varje avsnitt undertextad på svenska.
Håll utkik för kommande avsnitt
52m:40s
6272
Part 2 (Must Watch) Tehran Sermon - Rehbar Syed Ali Khamenie...
The Leader of the Islamic Revolution has described the \\\\\\\'unprecedented\\\\\\\' turnout of almost 85% in the election as a \\\\\\\'political...
The Leader of the Islamic Revolution has described the \\\\\\\'unprecedented\\\\\\\' turnout of almost 85% in the election as a \\\\\\\'political quake\\\\\\\' for the enemy.
Ayatollah Seyyed Ali Khamenei said high turnout in the election, which witnessed more than 40 million Iranians casting their votes, was a great manifestation of people\\\\\\\'s solidarity with the Islamic establishment.
Addressing Friday prayers congregation, Ayatollah Khamenei said that last Friday\\\\\\\'s election indicated a \\\\\\\'common sense of responsibility\\\\\\\' of the Iranian nation to determine the future of the country.
The Leader added that all those who took part in the election proved their \\\\\\\'political consciousness and commitment\\\\\\\' towards the establishment to the whole world.
The Leader said the high voter turnout in the election was a \\\\\\\'political quake\\\\\\\' for the enemy and a \\\\\\\'real celebration\\\\\\\' for the friends of the country.
\\\\\\\"The Islamic Republic of Iran will by no means betray the votes of the nation,\\\\\\\" the Leader said, adding the legal system of the election will not allow any ballot rigging in Iran.
Ayatollah Khamenei, however, maintained that the Guardian Council, the body tasked with overseeing the election, would look into the complaints of the candidates who are unhappy with the election results.
The Leader also added that the establishment would never give-in to illegal demands, urging all presidential candidates to pursue their complaints through legal channels. Ayatollah Khamenei called for an end to illegal street protests aimed at reversing the result of the election.
Following the announcement of the election outcome, supporters of the defeated candidate Mir-Hussein Mousavi-who rejected the election results-- took to the streets of Tehran and other cities in daily rallies.
The Leader also warned against attempts made by foreign media outlets seeking to destabilize the country and blamed Britain in particular. Ayatollah Khamenei also decried the slander of former and incumbent top officials in pre-election debates by candidates.
President Ahmadinejad was re-elected the next president of the country with over 60% percent of the votes.
He won over his three rivals Mir-Hossein Mousavi, Mehdi Karroubi and Mohsen Rezaei with almost 25 million votes.
The Leader said the time is over for rivalry, stressing that all should unite and line up behind the president-elect
Complete Transcript
http://www.presstv.com/detail.aspx?id=98610
In this sermon, I call all the respected brothers and sisters who have attended the Friday prayers here to piety and I advise them against any wrongdoing.
In this sermon, I will address the issue of the election, which is a hot topic in our country.
I want to address three different groups on three different issues; firstly, I want to address the general public. Secondly, I want to address the political elite, the candidates of the presidential election, activists and those who have been active in the process of election.
I also have something to say to the leaders of the global arrogance, certain Western governments and their media.
On the first issue, where I address you dear people, I want to express my appreciation and gratitude. I do not like to exaggerate while I am addressing my audience, but regarding the recent election, I must tell you great people that no matter what I say, words cannot describe the greatness of your great accomplishment.
The June 12 election was a great show of the people\\\\\\\'s sense of responsibility, their will to participate, and their dedication to the system.
Truly, I have never heard of anything similar to what you have accomplished taking place in any of the democratic systems around the world, whether they are false democracies or truly built on their people\\\\\\\'s vote.
In the Islamic Republic, aside from the 1979 referendum, there has no election like the one held last Friday with a turnout of almost 85 percent. This means almost 40 million voters. You can see the presence of the 12 and last Shia Imam behind this. This is a sign of God\\\\\\\'s blessing to us.
It is necessary that I address you all across the nation from the depths of my heart, to express my respect and tell you that I feel humble in your presence.
Our young generation showed and proved they have insight and that like the first generation of the Islamic Revolution, they are committed. The difference is, during the days of the revolution, revolutionary fire burned in the hearts of all. It was the same is the days of the imposed war but in a different sense.
Today, however, there is no more of that but we still witness this commitment, this sense of responsibility, this understanding and fervor in our youth. This is not something that can be ignored.
Of course, there are differences of taste and of opinion among our people. Some people support a certain candidate; others back another person and his words and ideas. This is natural, but you can see a collective commitment amid all this and amongst people of all walks of life. You can see a consensus, a collective commitment to the protection of our country and system.
Everyone entered the political scene in villages, towns, cities, major cities, different ethnic groups, people of different faiths, men, women, young and old. They all entered the scene. They all took part in this great movement.
My dear people, this election was a political tremor for your enemies. For your friends across the world, it was a real celebration -- a historical ceremony and victory.
Thirty years after the victory of the Islamic Revolution, such a huge turnout and show of commitment to the Islamic system and the late Imam [Khomeini] shows the renewal of the pledge of allegiance to the late Imam and the martyrs. This was a breath of fresh air, a new movement and a great opportunity for the Islamic system.
This election put religious democracy on display for the whole world to witness. All ill-wishers of the Islamic establishment saw for themselves the meaning of religious democracy.
This is an alternative path in the face of dictatorships and arrogant regimes on the one side and democracies devoid of spirituality and religion on the other. This is religious democracy. This is what brings the hearts of people together and draws them to the scene.
This is the first point I wanted to make about the election. The second point is that the June 12 election showed that people live with trust, hope and national enthusiasm in this country.
This is against a great deal of comments your enemies make in their propaganda. If the people of this country were not hopeful about their future, they would not have taken part in any election.
If people were not dedicated to the Islamic establishment, they would have never voted. If they did not feel free, they would have never shown up at polling stations. The trust they have in the Islamic system was evident in this election.
Later on, I will tell you how the enemy targeted the very trust of the people in the Islamic establishment. This trust is the very thing they want to crush. This trust is the greatest asset of the Islamic system, so they want to take it away from the Islamic establishment.
They want to cast doubt on the election and weaken the confidence of the people in the system. They want to cause the people to panic. The enemies of the Iranian nation know that without trust there would have been a low turnout.
A low turnout would have questioned the legitimacy of the establishment. That is what they are after. They wanted to take away your [people] trust and keep you away from the polls to target this legitimacy, and if they had achieved this goal, the damage done would have been incomparable to any other.
For the people to come to the polls en masse and then be told that they made a mistake and should not have trusted the Islamic establishment, this is an enemy game.
This path is the same one they pursued even before the elections. A few months before the election, in late march, I said in Mashhad that the enemy has started whispers and rumors that their will be vote rigging. They were preparing the grounds for the events of today.
I advised our friends in the country not to repeat what the enemy wants to plant in people\\\\\\\'s minds. The Islamic establishment has the people\\\\\\\'s trust and it has not gained this trust easily.
For the past 30 years, authorities in the Islamic Republic have managed to maintain this trust, with their performance and painstaking efforts.
The third issue I want to touch upon is the issue of rivalry. This competition was a free, serious and transparent race between four candidates as we all witnessed.
These competitions, debates and discussion were so transparent that some began to voice objections. I will tell you that to they had the right to object to some extent.
Certain problems were also created that resulted in what you see today. I must tell you that we were and still are under the impression that these rivalries were between the four candidates who are all individuals committed to the system.
The Enemies want to portray the situation in the media - some of which belong to the Zionists -as if there is a row between the proponents and opponents of the Islamic Republic. No, this is not the case, this very untrue.
The four candidates who entered the presidential race all belonged and still belong to the Islamic establishment. One of these four is the president of our country - a hardworking and trustworthy president. One of them is the two-term prime minister, he served the country when I myself was president. He was my prime minister for eight years. One of them was the commander of the Islamic Revolution Guard Corps and one of the wartime commanders. One them was two-time head of parliament and Majlis speaker. They are all members of our Islamic establishment.
Of course, they have differences of opinion and plans that differ from one another. But, they all belong to this Islamic establishment. This race was defined within the framework of the system. It was not a competition between insiders and outsiders as the Zionist and the US were trying to portray. No, this was a competition within the framework of the system between members of the system.
I know them all personally, I know their system of thought and their tastes very well. I am familiar with their personalities. I have worked with all of them closely. I know them all. But of course, I do not share all their views. I believe some of their views and executive records are subject to criticism.
I see some more suitable to serve the country than others. But, this is up to the people to decide, and this is exactly what happened, they chose who they wanted.
My desire and my choice was never announced nor was there any need for the people to pay heed to it. The people had their own criteria and this is what they based their decision on. Millions here and outside the country decided for themselves. This is an internal issue.
Misrepresenting the problem is underhand. The row is not between insiders of the system and outsiders. The row is not between revolutionary and anti-revolutionary forces, it is a difference of opinion between the members of the Islamic Revolution.
People who voted for these four candidates, voted with faith in the system. They believed their candidate of choice was better for the country so they voted for him. They voted in favor of the person they found most competent.
Well, these campaigns and debates were an important and interesting initiative. They were very clear, to the point and serious. The televised debates proved wrong those who were trying to say from the outside that these competitions are formalities.
They saw that these rivalries are real and serious. They saw that they are really battling it out and exchanging viewpoints. From this perspective, these debates were positive. But, they also had some negative points which I will touch upon.
The positive aspect was that in these televised discussions and debates everyone spoke their mind clearly and casually. A flood of criticism followed. Everyone was forced to respond. Everyone was criticized and they defended themselves. The stances that these individuals and groups had were unveiled before the eyes of the nation. They talked about their plans, commitments and projects.
All this was publicized for the people so that they could judge for themselves. People felt that in the Islamic system they are not the outsiders. Everything was clearly laid out before the people.
They were shown that the nature of their vote is not ceremonial. The right to vote truly does belong to the people. People want to have the right to choose. This is what the televised debates indicated.
One of the main reasons that ten million additional voters participated in this election was because the people\\\\\\\'s minds had been engaged, therefore they came and voted for the candidate of their choice.
These debates found their way into the streets and homes. These debates helped the people become better informed and hence make better decisions. The Islamic establishment is in favor of such debates.
Note that such debates should not be steered in a direction that may cause people to hold grudges against one another. If these debates had remained within their intended framework, they would have been positive. But when they turn into arguments than they will gradually bring grudges and hard feelings.
Of course, such debates should continue at managerial levels, but without a negative aspect. Officials should allow criticism and feel responsible to answer. If an individual is criticized, he must see it as an opportunity to enlighten the people and reveal fact and truth.
If these debates are regularly carried out [as normal government practice], at election time when there are such debates we would not witness such reactions. All arguments would emerge and all ideas would be exchanged over time. These are the positive aspects of such debates.
But, there have also been some negative aspects to the debates that need to be dealt with. In some cases, we saw that logical points were undermined and emotional and destructive responses dominated the debate.
There were efforts to portray the last four years as a dark era. There were also attempts to portray previous administrations in a similar light. Allegations were made that have not been proven in any court, rumors were used as a reference, and unjust remarks were made.
This administration, despite the excellent services it had rendered came under unjust attacks. Similarly, the performance of previous governments in the past 30 years came under attack. The candidates gave in to their emotions.
They made some positive points. They also raised some unpleasant negative issues. Like the rest of the nation, I sat and watched these TV debates. I took pride in the freedom of speech I witnessed. I enjoyed the fact that the Islamic Republic has been able to aid the people in deciding their future, but the shortcomings saddened me.
For supporters of the candidates the shortcomings and negative aspects were also a cause for concern; both sides were a party to this... both sides had their problems.
On the one hand, insults were hurled against the president of the country, even two to three months prior to these debates, speeches were brought to me and in them, I read the insults made and the accusations leveled against the president of the country who was elected by the vote of the people. They accused him of lying. This is not good. They fabricated documents against the government and distributed them everywhere.
I saw what was going on. They [accusations] were all untrue and contrary to the facts. They swore at the president, called him superstitious, and called him names. They closed their eyes to ethics and the law.
On the other hand, almost the same thing happened. The performance of the past 30 years of the Revolution was brought under question. People were named who are among the system\\\\\\\'s veteran figures.
They are people who have dedicated their lives to this establishment. Never before have I mentioned people by name in the Friday prayer sermons, but today, I have to mention some names, particularly Mr. [Akbar] Hashemi Rafsanjani, Mr. [Ali Akbar] Nateq-Nouri. I must mention their names and point out that nobody has accused them of corruption.
Now, if anyone has any claims or complaints regarding their [Hashemi Rafsanjani and Nateq-Nouri\\\\\\\'s] relatives they should refer to judicial authorities.
You cannot raise these issues in the media before they are proven. If it is proven, you can raise the issue as every member of society is equal, but you are not allowed to make claims. When such things are mentioned, misunderstandings are the outcome. This can cause misunderstandings for the younger generation.
Everyone knows Mr. Hashemi. My relationship with him goes back to before the Islamic Revolution. I have known him for more than 25 years. Mr. Hashemi was one of the main revolutionary figures.
He was one of the most active proponents of the revolution, and after the Islamic Revolution, he was one of the main political figures serving the people alongside the late Imam, And after the departure of the founder of the Islamic Revolution he has been alongside the leadership to date.
On several occasions, there were assassination attempts on his life. Before the revolution, he donated his possessions for the revolutionary cause. Our youth should know these facts. After the revolution, he had different responsibilities.
For eight years, he served as the president and before that he was the parliament speaker. He held other sensitive positions as well. Throughout these years, I am not aware of one incident in which he gathered wealth. These are the facts that everyone should know.
In the most sensitive of periods, he served the revolution and the establishment. Of course, my opinion and Mr. Rafsanjani\\\\\\\'s differs on numerous issues, which is natural. However, we should not create any misunderstandings for the people.
The president and Mr. Rafsanjani have had differences of opinion since the president took office in 2005. They have differences of opinion in foreign policy, in the manner of spreading social justice as well as on some cultural issues. However, the president\\\\\\\'s ideas are closer to mine.
The same goes fort Mr. Nateq-Nouri. He has also served the revolution, rendered great services for the establishment and there is not a shred of doubt about that.
The live televised debates are a positive step, but these shortcomings should be removed. After the debates, I had a talk with the president because I knew he would listen to me. The stance of the Islamic establishment is clear-cut regarding corruption and social justice. Corruption should be fought anywhere it is traced.
There is a point I want to make here. We do not claim that our establishment is free of all economic and financial corruption. Yes, there is corruption. If there was no corruption, I would not have written the eight-point letter to the heads of the legislative, judiciary, and executive branches of the country.
We have corruption, but the Islamic establishment is one of the healthiest establishments in the world today. However, it is not right to accuse the country of corruption based on some Zionist reports and sources.
Moreover, questioning the credibility of statesmen goes beyond the bounds of decency. Financial corruption is an important issue in the Islamic establishment. The judiciary, executive and legislative branches of the country must do everything within their power to fight against it.
Everyone is duty-bound to fight corruption. If corruption is not contained, it will spread in the same manner as you see occurring in many countries…. They are struggling with an alarming level of corruption as you have heard about in the UK. This is only a fraction of the scandal as it goes way beyond what has been publicized.
Let me summarize the points I made. The Friday election was a historical event, which touched the entire world. Some of our enemies, however, attempted to cast doubt over this absolute and definitive victory. Some even attempted to portray it as a national defeat.
They did not want you to enjoy this victory. They did not want to see the highest turnout in the world go down in history in your name. However, it has happened, it has been recorded in history. They cannot manipulate this.
The time for rivalry is passed... These four candidates have all fought in the battlefront of this revolution and they are members of this establishment. Forty million people went to the polls and cast their votes for this revolution.
It was not only the 24 million votes that went to the president; 40 million votes were cast in favor of the revolution. The people have trust [in the establishment], and all supporters of candidates should rest assured that the Islamic establishment would never betray the people\\\\\\\'s trust.
In fact, the electoral system of the country does not allow for any vote rigging, which is testified to by all those in charge of the election process.
When there is a margin of one hundred thousand or one million at most, then one can doubt that there may have been some form of manipulation or irregularity; however, when there is a difference of eleven million votes, how could any vote rigging have taken place?
However, as I have said, and the Guardian Council has accepted, if some people have doubts then it should be dealt with through legal channels. Everything must be dealt strictly though legal channels. I will never accept illegal demands.
If the legal frameworks are breached today, then no future election can be guaranteed. In every election, there is only one winner, and of course, some defeated candidates. Complaints, if there is any doubt, should be pursued through legal channels. We have a comprehensive and competent legal system.
Just as the candidates have the right to appoint observers, they are given the right to file complaints. I have requested the Guardian Council conduct a partial vote recount in the presence of the candidates and their representatives. We have no problem with this.
I want to address the politicians, candidates and political parties at this point. We are at a critical historical juncture. Look at current world affairs, the situation in the Middle East, global economic woes and the situation in our neighboring countries.
We are duty bound to remain vigilant and to be careful not to commit mistakes at this critical point in time. In the election, people fulfilled their duty in the best way possible, which was by going to the polls. We have heavier responsibilities on our shoulders now.
Those figures who are looked up to by the people and politicians, should be cautious about their words and deeds. If they show any amount of extremist attitude, it will penetrate into the ranks of the people.
It may have dangerous consequences and may eventually get out of control. Extremism in society will trigger or fan other extremist moves in the country. If political elites disobey the law and make wrong decisions, they will be held accountable for any violent actions or rioting that ensues.
I urge these people, these friends of mine, to exercise restraint and patience. You should see enemy hands at work [against the country]. You should see hungry wolves laying in ambush. They are taking off their masks of diplomacy and are showing their true colors. I urge you to open your eyes and see the enemy.
In the past few days the prominent diplomats of some Western countries, which have been dealing with us through diplomatic rhetoric, have removed their masks. Today you can see their true face. They are now showing their enmity toward the Islamic establishment and the most treacherous of them all is Britain.
I tell these brothers of ours to think of their responsibility. You are responsible before God. I call on you to remember what Imam has written in his will; the law has the final say.
All differences should be settled at the ballot box. This is what elections are for, to let ballot boxes and not the streets determine what the people want.
If after every election, the supporters of the candidates who have lost take to streets and the supporters of the candidate who has won respond in the same manner, then what need would we have for elections?
Why should the people have to suffer? We should not take to the streets to show off with the number of our supporters to the people. Such acts are not a political issue for those terrorists who take advantage of the situation to hide among the masses in order to carry out their agenda.
It is a very good cover for these saboteurs. Who will take responsible for this? Some of the people who were killed in these riots were ordinary people, ordinary Basij members. Who will be held accountable for this?
They may start taking advantage of this situation to assassinate Basij members, which will naturally provoke emotional reactions. Who is to be held responsible for this? One is grieved to see them attack religious students at Tehran University dormitories and afterwards chant slogans in support of the leadership.
Post-election rivalry on the streets is not the right way to go. It only challenges the election. I want all sides to put an end to this. If they do not stop such actions, then they will be responsible for the repercussions of such incidents.
It is also wrong to assume that street riots can be used as leverage to pressure the establishment and to force officials to listen to them for what they believe is in the interest of the country.
Giving in to illegal demands under pressure is in itself the beginning of dictatorship. This is a miscalculation and the consequences will be directed at those who orchestrated them. If necessary, I will tell the people about them in due time.
I ask all these brothers and friends of mine to act based on friendship and abide by the law. I hope God will help us choose the righteous path. The celebration of 40 million votes should be appreciated and the enemy must not be allowed to ruin the celebration. However, if certain people decide to choose another path, then I will have no choice but to talk with the people more openly.
The third group I wish to address are the leaders of the Western media and arrogant powers. In the past two to three weeks, I have heard the words and witnessed the actions of politicians from the United States and certain European countries.
Before the elections, they attempted to cast doubt over the election itself so that there would be a low voter turnout. They had their own assessments of results forecasts, but they did not expect the mass participation of the people. They never predicted an 85 percent turnout, or 40 million voters.
When they saw the mass turnout, they were shocked. They realized the reality of Iran. They came to understand that they need to adapt themselves to the new situation be it regional, nuclear or internal.
When they saw the great popular movement on Election Day, they realized that a new chapter had been opened with regards to Iran and that they must come to terms with it. When some candidates began protesting the results, they felt that there was a change, so they jumped at the chance to ride this wave.
Their tone after the election changed on Saturday and Sunday. Their attention shifted to the riots and that was when they gradually began removing their masks.
Western officials, their presidents, prime ministers and foreign ministers commented on this situation. The US President said that we were waiting for the day when people would take to the streets. At the same time they write letters saying that they want to have ties and that they respect the Islamic Republic. Which are we to believe?
Inside the country, their elements [foreign countries] began street protests and vandalism, they set fire to public property, they made shops and businesses insecure, and they are trying to rob the people of their security.
This has nothing to do with the people and their preferred candidates. This kind of behavior stems from ill-wishers, mercenaries and elements working for Western and Zionist secret services.
The incidents occurring inside the country have misled some of those outside our borders, who imagine Iran to be the same as Georgia. A Zionist American capitalist a few years ago, had been quoted in the media saying that he had spent 10 million dollars in Georgia to start a velvet revolution.
Our nation cannot be compared to any another nation. Their problem is they have not come to know this revolution and its people.
American officials say they are worried about the Iranian nation, how can you be worried? Can you even speak about human rights when you are responsible for the blood shed in Afghanistan and Iraq? In Palestine who has and is supporting and funding the Zionist regime?
During the term of a previous US government, eighty people affiliated with the Davidian sect were burnt alive in their compound in Waco, Texas. For some reason these people were disliked by the then US administration. Eighty people were burnt in that building, how dare you talk of human rights?
In my opinion, these western officials should at least feel a little embarrassment!
45m:31s
49846
[FULL SPEECH] Supreme Leader Ayatullah Sayyed Ali Khamenei - Friday...
Complete Transcript
http://www.presstv.com/detail.aspx?id=98610
In this sermon, I call all the respected brothers and sisters who have attended...
Complete Transcript
http://www.presstv.com/detail.aspx?id=98610
In this sermon, I call all the respected brothers and sisters who have attended the Friday prayers here to piety and I advise them against any wrongdoing.
In this sermon, I will address the issue of the election, which is a hot topic in our country.
I want to address three different groups on three different issues; firstly, I want to address the general public. Secondly, I want to address the political elite, the candidates of the presidential election, activists and those who have been active in the process of election.
I also have something to say to the leaders of the global arrogance, certain Western governments and their media.
On the first issue, where I address you dear people, I want to express my appreciation and gratitude. I do not like to exaggerate while I am addressing my audience, but regarding the recent election, I must tell you great people that no matter what I say, words cannot describe the greatness of your great accomplishment.
The June 12 election was a great show of the people\\\\\\\'s sense of responsibility, their will to participate, and their dedication to the system.
Truly, I have never heard of anything similar to what you have accomplished taking place in any of the democratic systems around the world, whether they are false democracies or truly built on their people\\\\\\\'s vote.
In the Islamic Republic, aside from the 1979 referendum, there has no election like the one held last Friday with a turnout of almost 85 percent. This means almost 40 million voters. You can see the presence of the 12 and last Shia Imam behind this. This is a sign of God\\\\\\\'s blessing to us.
It is necessary that I address you all across the nation from the depths of my heart, to express my respect and tell you that I feel humble in your presence.
Our young generation showed and proved they have insight and that like the first generation of the Islamic Revolution, they are committed. The difference is, during the days of the revolution, revolutionary fire burned in the hearts of all. It was the same is the days of the imposed war but in a different sense.
Today, however, there is no more of that but we still witness this commitment, this sense of responsibility, this understanding and fervor in our youth. This is not something that can be ignored.
Of course, there are differences of taste and of opinion among our people. Some people support a certain candidate; others back another person and his words and ideas. This is natural, but you can see a collective commitment amid all this and amongst people of all walks of life. You can see a consensus, a collective commitment to the protection of our country and system.
Everyone entered the political scene in villages, towns, cities, major cities, different ethnic groups, people of different faiths, men, women, young and old. They all entered the scene. They all took part in this great movement.
My dear people, this election was a political tremor for your enemies. For your friends across the world, it was a real celebration -- a historical ceremony and victory.
Thirty years after the victory of the Islamic Revolution, such a huge turnout and show of commitment to the Islamic system and the late Imam [Khomeini] shows the renewal of the pledge of allegiance to the late Imam and the martyrs. This was a breath of fresh air, a new movement and a great opportunity for the Islamic system.
This election put religious democracy on display for the whole world to witness. All ill-wishers of the Islamic establishment saw for themselves the meaning of religious democracy.
This is an alternative path in the face of dictatorships and arrogant regimes on the one side and democracies devoid of spirituality and religion on the other. This is religious democracy. This is what brings the hearts of people together and draws them to the scene.
This is the first point I wanted to make about the election. The second point is that the June 12 election showed that people live with trust, hope and national enthusiasm in this country.
This is against a great deal of comments your enemies make in their propaganda. If the people of this country were not hopeful about their future, they would not have taken part in any election.
If people were not dedicated to the Islamic establishment, they would have never voted. If they did not feel free, they would have never shown up at polling stations. The trust they have in the Islamic system was evident in this election.
Later on, I will tell you how the enemy targeted the very trust of the people in the Islamic establishment. This trust is the very thing they want to crush. This trust is the greatest asset of the Islamic system, so they want to take it away from the Islamic establishment.
They want to cast doubt on the election and weaken the confidence of the people in the system. They want to cause the people to panic. The enemies of the Iranian nation know that without trust there would have been a low turnout.
A low turnout would have questioned the legitimacy of the establishment. That is what they are after. They wanted to take away your [people] trust and keep you away from the polls to target this legitimacy, and if they had achieved this goal, the damage done would have been incomparable to any other.
For the people to come to the polls en masse and then be told that they made a mistake and should not have trusted the Islamic establishment, this is an enemy game.
This path is the same one they pursued even before the elections. A few months before the election, in late march, I said in Mashhad that the enemy has started whispers and rumors that their will be vote rigging. They were preparing the grounds for the events of today.
I advised our friends in the country not to repeat what the enemy wants to plant in people\\\\\\\'s minds. The Islamic establishment has the people\\\\\\\'s trust and it has not gained this trust easily.
For the past 30 years, authorities in the Islamic Republic have managed to maintain this trust, with their performance and painstaking efforts.
The third issue I want to touch upon is the issue of rivalry. This competition was a free, serious and transparent race between four candidates as we all witnessed.
These competitions, debates and discussion were so transparent that some began to voice objections. I will tell you that to they had the right to object to some extent.
Certain problems were also created that resulted in what you see today. I must tell you that we were and still are under the impression that these rivalries were between the four candidates who are all individuals committed to the system.
The Enemies want to portray the situation in the media - some of which belong to the Zionists -as if there is a row between the proponents and opponents of the Islamic Republic. No, this is not the case, this very untrue.
The four candidates who entered the presidential race all belonged and still belong to the Islamic establishment. One of these four is the president of our country - a hardworking and trustworthy president. One of them is the two-term prime minister, he served the country when I myself was president. He was my prime minister for eight years. One of them was the commander of the Islamic Revolution Guard Corps and one of the wartime commanders. One them was two-time head of parliament and Majlis speaker. They are all members of our Islamic establishment.
Of course, they have differences of opinion and plans that differ from one another. But, they all belong to this Islamic establishment. This race was defined within the framework of the system. It was not a competition between insiders and outsiders as the Zionist and the US were trying to portray. No, this was a competition within the framework of the system between members of the system.
I know them all personally, I know their system of thought and their tastes very well. I am familiar with their personalities. I have worked with all of them closely. I know them all. But of course, I do not share all their views. I believe some of their views and executive records are subject to criticism.
I see some more suitable to serve the country than others. But, this is up to the people to decide, and this is exactly what happened, they chose who they wanted.
My desire and my choice was never announced nor was there any need for the people to pay heed to it. The people had their own criteria and this is what they based their decision on. Millions here and outside the country decided for themselves. This is an internal issue.
Misrepresenting the problem is underhand. The row is not between insiders of the system and outsiders. The row is not between revolutionary and anti-revolutionary forces, it is a difference of opinion between the members of the Islamic Revolution.
People who voted for these four candidates, voted with faith in the system. They believed their candidate of choice was better for the country so they voted for him. They voted in favor of the person they found most competent.
Well, these campaigns and debates were an important and interesting initiative. They were very clear, to the point and serious. The televised debates proved wrong those who were trying to say from the outside that these competitions are formalities.
They saw that these rivalries are real and serious. They saw that they are really battling it out and exchanging viewpoints. From this perspective, these debates were positive. But, they also had some negative points which I will touch upon.
The positive aspect was that in these televised discussions and debates everyone spoke their mind clearly and casually. A flood of criticism followed. Everyone was forced to respond. Everyone was criticized and they defended themselves. The stances that these individuals and groups had were unveiled before the eyes of the nation. They talked about their plans, commitments and projects.
All this was publicized for the people so that they could judge for themselves. People felt that in the Islamic system they are not the outsiders. Everything was clearly laid out before the people.
They were shown that the nature of their vote is not ceremonial. The right to vote truly does belong to the people. People want to have the right to choose. This is what the televised debates indicated.
One of the main reasons that ten million additional voters participated in this election was because the people\\\\\\\'s minds had been engaged, therefore they came and voted for the candidate of their choice.
These debates found their way into the streets and homes. These debates helped the people become better informed and hence make better decisions. The Islamic establishment is in favor of such debates.
Note that such debates should not be steered in a direction that may cause people to hold grudges against one another. If these debates had remained within their intended framework, they would have been positive. But when they turn into arguments than they will gradually bring grudges and hard feelings.
Of course, such debates should continue at managerial levels, but without a negative aspect. Officials should allow criticism and feel responsible to answer. If an individual is criticized, he must see it as an opportunity to enlighten the people and reveal fact and truth.
If these debates are regularly carried out [as normal government practice], at election time when there are such debates we would not witness such reactions. All arguments would emerge and all ideas would be exchanged over time. These are the positive aspects of such debates.
But, there have also been some negative aspects to the debates that need to be dealt with. In some cases, we saw that logical points were undermined and emotional and destructive responses dominated the debate.
There were efforts to portray the last four years as a dark era. There were also attempts to portray previous administrations in a similar light. Allegations were made that have not been proven in any court, rumors were used as a reference, and unjust remarks were made.
This administration, despite the excellent services it had rendered came under unjust attacks. Similarly, the performance of previous governments in the past 30 years came under attack. The candidates gave in to their emotions.
They made some positive points. They also raised some unpleasant negative issues. Like the rest of the nation, I sat and watched these TV debates. I took pride in the freedom of speech I witnessed. I enjoyed the fact that the Islamic Republic has been able to aid the people in deciding their future, but the shortcomings saddened me.
For supporters of the candidates the shortcomings and negative aspects were also a cause for concern; both sides were a party to this... both sides had their problems.
On the one hand, insults were hurled against the president of the country, even two to three months prior to these debates, speeches were brought to me and in them, I read the insults made and the accusations leveled against the president of the country who was elected by the vote of the people. They accused him of lying. This is not good. They fabricated documents against the government and distributed them everywhere.
I saw what was going on. They [accusations] were all untrue and contrary to the facts. They swore at the president, called him superstitious, and called him names. They closed their eyes to ethics and the law.
On the other hand, almost the same thing happened. The performance of the past 30 years of the Revolution was brought under question. People were named who are among the system\\\\\\\'s veteran figures.
They are people who have dedicated their lives to this establishment. Never before have I mentioned people by name in the Friday prayer sermons, but today, I have to mention some names, particularly Mr. [Akbar] Hashemi Rafsanjani, Mr. [Ali Akbar] Nateq-Nouri. I must mention their names and point out that nobody has accused them of corruption.
Now, if anyone has any claims or complaints regarding their [Hashemi Rafsanjani and Nateq-Nouri\\\\\\\'s] relatives they should refer to judicial authorities.
You cannot raise these issues in the media before they are proven. If it is proven, you can raise the issue as every member of society is equal, but you are not allowed to make claims. When such things are mentioned, misunderstandings are the outcome. This can cause misunderstandings for the younger generation.
Everyone knows Mr. Hashemi. My relationship with him goes back to before the Islamic Revolution. I have known him for more than 25 years. Mr. Hashemi was one of the main revolutionary figures.
He was one of the most active proponents of the revolution, and after the Islamic Revolution, he was one of the main political figures serving the people alongside the late Imam, And after the departure of the founder of the Islamic Revolution he has been alongside the leadership to date.
On several occasions, there were assassination attempts on his life. Before the revolution, he donated his possessions for the revolutionary cause. Our youth should know these facts. After the revolution, he had different responsibilities.
For eight years, he served as the president and before that he was the parliament speaker. He held other sensitive positions as well. Throughout these years, I am not aware of one incident in which he gathered wealth. These are the facts that everyone should know.
In the most sensitive of periods, he served the revolution and the establishment. Of course, my opinion and Mr. Rafsanjani\\\\\\\'s differs on numerous issues, which is natural. However, we should not create any misunderstandings for the people.
The president and Mr. Rafsanjani have had differences of opinion since the president took office in 2005. They have differences of opinion in foreign policy, in the manner of spreading social justice as well as on some cultural issues. However, the president\\\\\\\'s ideas are closer to mine.
The same goes fort Mr. Nateq-Nouri. He has also served the revolution, rendered great services for the establishment and there is not a shred of doubt about that.
The live televised debates are a positive step, but these shortcomings should be removed. After the debates, I had a talk with the president because I knew he would listen to me. The stance of the Islamic establishment is clear-cut regarding corruption and social justice. Corruption should be fought anywhere it is traced.
There is a point I want to make here. We do not claim that our establishment is free of all economic and financial corruption. Yes, there is corruption. If there was no corruption, I would not have written the eight-point letter to the heads of the legislative, judiciary, and executive branches of the country.
We have corruption, but the Islamic establishment is one of the healthiest establishments in the world today. However, it is not right to accuse the country of corruption based on some Zionist reports and sources.
Moreover, questioning the credibility of statesmen goes beyond the bounds of decency. Financial corruption is an important issue in the Islamic establishment. The judiciary, executive and legislative branches of the country must do everything within their power to fight against it.
Everyone is duty-bound to fight corruption. If corruption is not contained, it will spread in the same manner as you see occurring in many countries…. They are struggling with an alarming level of corruption as you have heard about in the UK. This is only a fraction of the scandal as it goes way beyond what has been publicized.
Let me summarize the points I made. The Friday election was a historical event, which touched the entire world. Some of our enemies, however, attempted to cast doubt over this absolute and definitive victory. Some even attempted to portray it as a national defeat.
They did not want you to enjoy this victory. They did not want to see the highest turnout in the world go down in history in your name. However, it has happened, it has been recorded in history. They cannot manipulate this.
The time for rivalry is passed... These four candidates have all fought in the battlefront of this revolution and they are members of this establishment. Forty million people went to the polls and cast their votes for this revolution.
It was not only the 24 million votes that went to the president; 40 million votes were cast in favor of the revolution. The people have trust [in the establishment], and all supporters of candidates should rest assured that the Islamic establishment would never betray the people\\\\\\\'s trust.
In fact, the electoral system of the country does not allow for any vote rigging, which is testified to by all those in charge of the election process.
When there is a margin of one hundred thousand or one million at most, then one can doubt that there may have been some form of manipulation or irregularity; however, when there is a difference of eleven million votes, how could any vote rigging have taken place?
However, as I have said, and the Guardian Council has accepted, if some people have doubts then it should be dealt with through legal channels. Everything must be dealt strictly though legal channels. I will never accept illegal demands.
If the legal frameworks are breached today, then no future election can be guaranteed. In every election, there is only one winner, and of course, some defeated candidates. Complaints, if there is any doubt, should be pursued through legal channels. We have a comprehensive and competent legal system.
Just as the candidates have the right to appoint observers, they are given the right to file complaints. I have requested the Guardian Council conduct a partial vote recount in the presence of the candidates and their representatives. We have no problem with this.
I want to address the politicians, candidates and political parties at this point. We are at a critical historical juncture. Look at current world affairs, the situation in the Middle East, global economic woes and the situation in our neighboring countries.
We are duty bound to remain vigilant and to be careful not to commit mistakes at this critical point in time. In the election, people fulfilled their duty in the best way possible, which was by going to the polls. We have heavier responsibilities on our shoulders now.
Those figures who are looked up to by the people and politicians, should be cautious about their words and deeds. If they show any amount of extremist attitude, it will penetrate into the ranks of the people.
It may have dangerous consequences and may eventually get out of control. Extremism in society will trigger or fan other extremist moves in the country. If political elites disobey the law and make wrong decisions, they will be held accountable for any violent actions or rioting that ensues.
I urge these people, these friends of mine, to exercise restraint and patience. You should see enemy hands at work [against the country]. You should see hungry wolves laying in ambush. They are taking off their masks of diplomacy and are showing their true colors. I urge you to open your eyes and see the enemy.
In the past few days the prominent diplomats of some Western countries, which have been dealing with us through diplomatic rhetoric, have removed their masks. Today you can see their true face. They are now showing their enmity toward the Islamic establishment and the most treacherous of them all is Britain.
I tell these brothers of ours to think of their responsibility. You are responsible before God. I call on you to remember what Imam has written in his will; the law has the final say.
All differences should be settled at the ballot box. This is what elections are for, to let ballot boxes and not the streets determine what the people want.
If after every election, the supporters of the candidates who have lost take to streets and the supporters of the candidate who has won respond in the same manner, then what need would we have for elections?
Why should the people have to suffer? We should not take to the streets to show off with the number of our supporters to the people. Such acts are not a political issue for those terrorists who take advantage of the situation to hide among the masses in order to carry out their agenda.
It is a very good cover for these saboteurs. Who will take responsible for this? Some of the people who were killed in these riots were ordinary people, ordinary Basij members. Who will be held accountable for this?
They may start taking advantage of this situation to assassinate Basij members, which will naturally provoke emotional reactions. Who is to be held responsible for this? One is grieved to see them attack religious students at Tehran University dormitories and afterwards chant slogans in support of the leadership.
Post-election rivalry on the streets is not the right way to go. It only challenges the election. I want all sides to put an end to this. If they do not stop such actions, then they will be responsible for the repercussions of such incidents.
It is also wrong to assume that street riots can be used as leverage to pressure the establishment and to force officials to listen to them for what they believe is in the interest of the country.
Giving in to illegal demands under pressure is in itself the beginning of dictatorship. This is a miscalculation and the consequences will be directed at those who orchestrated them. If necessary, I will tell the people about them in due time.
I ask all these brothers and friends of mine to act based on friendship and abide by the law. I hope God will help us choose the righteous path. The celebration of 40 million votes should be appreciated and the enemy must not be allowed to ruin the celebration. However, if certain people decide to choose another path, then I will have no choice but to talk with the people more openly.
The third group I wish to address are the leaders of the Western media and arrogant powers. In the past two to three weeks, I have heard the words and witnessed the actions of politicians from the United States and certain European countries.
Before the elections, they attempted to cast doubt over the election itself so that there would be a low voter turnout. They had their own assessments of results forecasts, but they did not expect the mass participation of the people. They never predicted an 85 percent turnout, or 40 million voters.
When they saw the mass turnout, they were shocked. They realized the reality of Iran. They came to understand that they need to adapt themselves to the new situation be it regional, nuclear or internal.
When they saw the great popular movement on Election Day, they realized that a new chapter had been opened with regards to Iran and that they must come to terms with it. When some candidates began protesting the results, they felt that there was a change, so they jumped at the chance to ride this wave.
Their tone after the election changed on Saturday and Sunday. Their attention shifted to the riots and that was when they gradually began removing their masks.
Western officials, their presidents, prime ministers and foreign ministers commented on this situation. The US President said that we were waiting for the day when people would take to the streets. At the same time they write letters saying that they want to have ties and that they respect the Islamic Republic. Which are we to believe?
Inside the country, their elements [foreign countries] began street protests and vandalism, they set fire to public property, they made shops and businesses insecure, and they are trying to rob the people of their security.
This has nothing to do with the people and their preferred candidates. This kind of behavior stems from ill-wishers, mercenaries and elements working for Western and Zionist secret services.
The incidents occurring inside the country have misled some of those outside our borders, who imagine Iran to be the same as Georgia. A Zionist American capitalist a few years ago, had been quoted in the media saying that he had spent 10 million dollars in Georgia to start a velvet revolution.
Our nation cannot be compared to any another nation. Their problem is they have not come to know this revolution and its people.
American officials say they are worried about the Iranian nation, how can you be worried? Can you even speak about human rights when you are responsible for the blood shed in Afghanistan and Iraq? In Palestine who has and is supporting and funding the Zionist regime?
During the term of a previous US government, eighty people affiliated with the Davidian sect were burnt alive in their compound in Waco, Texas. For some reason these people were disliked by the then US administration. Eighty people were burnt in that building, how dare you talk of human rights?
In my opinion, these western officials should at least feel a little embarrassment!
Supreme Leader Ayatullah Sayyed Ali Khamenei - Friday Prayer Speech - 19Jun09 - English
105m:31s
53986
[1/2] Resulullahın Babası - Kurban - Dubbed in Turkish
Yayın Formatı: 3 VCD
Yönetmen: Abbas Moradiyan, Mustafa Pür Hamidi
Oyuncular: Mahmud Meşrute, Haydar Nikayin, Ziya Tahiri, M. Rıza...
Yayın Formatı: 3 VCD
Yönetmen: Abbas Moradiyan, Mustafa Pür Hamidi
Oyuncular: Mahmud Meşrute, Haydar Nikayin, Ziya Tahiri, M. Rıza Ebulhaseni
B e n i k i k u r b a n l ı ğ ı n o ğ l u y u m. Hz. Muhammed (S.A.A)
O n u n B a b a s ı (Abdülmuttalibin Kurbanı)
Mekkenin büyük önderi Abdülmuttalib, saklı hazineleri ve zemzemi rüyâsında görerek ortaya çıkarmak gibi büyük ilâhi ikramların tanığıdır. Ancak kendisine muhalefet edenlerin karşısında on iki yaşındaki bir tek oğluyla yalnızdır. Rabbine yakarıp, kendisine on oğul verirse bunlardan birini kurban edeceğini vaad eder. Kabul olan duâsında verdiği bu söz yıllar sonra yine rüyâsında hatırlatılır. Bütün oğulları bu duâya borçlu oldukları canlarını vermekte tereddüt etmeyeceklerini söyleseler de çekilen kura tüm Mekkeyi yasa boğar. A h l â k ı, c ö m e r t l i ğ i ve g ü z e l l i ğ i ile babasının düşmanlarınca bile sevilip takdîr edilen, Mekkenin Ayı olarak meşhûr olmuş, Abdülmuttalipin de en sevdiği A b d u l l a h tır kurbanlık.
77m:2s
12355
Ayatollah Khamenei : Islamic revolutions from Yemen to Bahrain to Egypt,...
English Voiceover (Recorded from Press TV, June 3, 2012)
Part of speech of the Leader of the Muslim Ummah, and Supreme Leader of the...
English Voiceover (Recorded from Press TV, June 3, 2012)
Part of speech of the Leader of the Muslim Ummah, and Supreme Leader of the Islamic Revolution , Ayatullah Imam Sayyed Ali al-Khamenei(HA) on June 4, 2012
http://www.leader.ir/langs/en/index.php?p=contentShow&id=9483
http://english.khamenei.ir//index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id...
The Islamic Revolution Leader cautioned that the west and its puppet regimes were trying to make the revolutionary nations to perceive their revolutions were useless, adding however that unlike those western claims, the political and social situation on the ground has effectively changed due to the revolutions and that greater changes were forthcoming.
Ayatollah Khamenei described Egypt as a great country with an influential nation, adding that former corrupt rulers had stolen the Egyptian nation\\\\\\\'s dignity by turning it into a strategic treasure for the usurping Israel however today the treasure has been recovered from the Zionist usurpers.
Ayatollah Khamenei said the Mubarak regime was tasked to guarantee the Israeli security even at the cost of imprisoning one and a half million people in Gaza during the 22-day Israeli war on the besieged enclave however, today, with Mubarak ousted, the Zionist regime feels naked and goes upset.
The Islamic Revolution Leader said a military hue and cry made by the Zionist authorities against Iran actually exposed their empty hands and fearful state, adding that the regime\\\\\\\'s authorities are well aware that they are now more vulnerable than ever so that any inappropriate action on their part would lash back down on themselves like thunders.
Ayatollah Khamenei said the US and other western powers, as unconditional supporters of the Zionist regime were suffering much unfavorable conditions nowadays due to their economic and social problems, adding that the crisis has become more tangible after the falling from power of several pro-US governments across Europe as well as an ever increasing hatred on the part of nations against the US.
Ayatollah Khamenei cautioned that the west seeks to transfer its own crisis to Asia and Africa, adding that a major western method to transfer its problems was to incite sectarian and religious strife in the Middle Eastern and North African revolutionary countries with a view to develop a counter-movement from inside the very revolutions.
\\\\\\\"Today, Americans have embarked on inciting sectarian and religious conflicts in the revolutionary countries by using the British experiences in such fields; all the nations and their scholars, either Shii or Sunni, must be vigilant not to advance the enemy conspiracy,\\\\\\\" Ayatollah Khamenei urged.
Ayatollah Khamenei reaffirmed however that stability will be restored to the revolutionary countries, especially Egypt and that any dictator regimes will be uprooted from the region.
Ayatollah Khamenei deplored that amid these developments the Bahraini people were suffering double innocence. \\\\\\\"The Bahraini people are simply repressed by a despotic, dictator regime only because they wish to cherish the rudiments of democracy,\\\\\\\" the Islamic Revolution Leader said.
The Islamic Revolution Leader said that all the revolutionary nations would eventually fulfill their goals only if they avoid sectarian or religious conflicts
19m:24s
35144
Another attack on ISLAM by Javed Ghamdi امام مہدی کا کوئی...
He is an exposed enemy of Islam. Inform others.
Coming of Imam Mahdi (a.s) is a undoubted reality of Islam!
It is a proven fact. Shia...
He is an exposed enemy of Islam. Inform others.
Coming of Imam Mahdi (a.s) is a undoubted reality of Islam!
It is a proven fact. Shia Muslims and Sunni Muslims both believe in Imam Mahdi (a.s). There are many many "sahih" ahadith about Imam Mahdi (a.s).
Ghamdi has been actively working to damage the core of Islam for a long time now!!! Read about this open enemy of Islam. Shame on Pakistan's government to allow and assist such munafiqeen to make people go astray.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Javed_Ahmad_Ghamidi
1m:7s
23120
2012 IRAN STRONGER THAN EVER (Documentary) - English sub Farsi
http://uncontained.ir/en
\"Uncontained\" has documented the quest of a Pakistani student in Iran between 2010 and 2011. After the...
http://uncontained.ir/en
\"Uncontained\" has documented the quest of a Pakistani student in Iran between 2010 and 2011. After the assassination of two nuclear scientists in November 2010, \"Mohtashim\" gets involved in Iran\'s nuclear case to investigate allegations that Iran is building nuclear weapons. He encounters with different people such as the controversial Member of Parliament \"Ahmad Shirzad\", an expelled French author, Thierry Meyssan and Marzieh Hashemi (Milani Franklin) an African American journalist.
A work by Safir Documentary Center with the assistance of Group 313 Productions
Directed by: Mostafa Rezvani
Produced by: Mohammad Hassanpur
Cinematography: Amir Taheri
Music: Hamid Reza Allahyary
Associate Producer: Mohsen Akhavan
Executive Producer: Arman Group
59m:46s
7566
Der Sieg der islamischen Revolution im Iran - 1979: Das islamische...
Als Islamische Revolution wird eine Transformation des politischen Systems und der gesellschaftlichen Ordnung hin zu einem Islamischen Staat...
Als Islamische Revolution wird eine Transformation des politischen Systems und der gesellschaftlichen Ordnung hin zu einem Islamischen Staat bezeichnet. Die bekannteste und in der Literatur auch meist als \\\\\\\"die\\\\\\\" Islamische Revolution bezeichnete war diejenige zur Gründung der Islamischen Republik Iran.
Ziel einer Islamischen Revolution ist die Gründung und der Aufbau einer Gesellschaft, in der jedes Individuum in seiner Annäherung zu seinem Schöpfer gefördert, und Aspekte, welche den Menschen von seiner eigenen Natur entfremden, vermieden werden. Dieses ist nach Ansicht des Islam u.a. durch die Etablierung des islamischen Rechts [scharia] in seiner zeitgemäßen Aulegung und Interpretaiton durch den Statthalte der Rechtsgelehrten [wilayat-ul-faqih] möglich. In solch einem System werden die universellen Werte aller Menschen, wie z.B. Gerechtigkeit, gefördert, so dass die Islamische Revolution auch Nichtmuslimen zugute kommt.
Zwar wird in der Westlichen Welt im engeren Sinne mit der Islamischen Revolution die Absetzung von Schah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi im Jahre 1979 im Iran verbunden, aber in der Philosophie der Islamischen Revolution handelt es sich um eine immerwährende Entwicklungsanstrengung des Menschen hin zu einer kollektiven Weiterentwicklung auf dem Weg Gottes. Erfolgreicher Leiter der Islamischen Revolution war Imam Chomeini.
weiterlesen: http://www.eslam.de/begriffe/i/islamische_revolution.htm
3m:48s
8429
[05Oct19] El gran ayatolá Sistani llama a evitar violencia en las...
El máximo clérigo chií de Irak, el ayatolá Seyed Ali Sistani, ha instado a evitar la violencia en las protestas que vive el país árabe en los...
El máximo clérigo chií de Irak, el ayatolá Seyed Ali Sistani, ha instado a evitar la violencia en las protestas que vive el país árabe en los últimos días.
“Es muy doloroso que haya habido tantas muertes, bajas y destrucción” por los enfrentamientos entre los manifestantes antigubernamentales y las fuerzas de seguridad en los últimos días, ha recalcado el ayatolá Sistani en una mensaje leído por su representante, Ahmad al-Safi, durante el sermón del rezo colectivo del viernes, en la ciudad santa de Karbalá.
“Los ataques contra manifestantes pacíficos y las fuerzas de seguridad son rechazados y condenados”, ha recalcado.
LEER MÁS: https://www.hispantv.com/noticias/irak/439218/protestas-violentas-muertos-bagdad-abdul-mahdi
Mientras tanto, ha criticado a los poderes Ejecutivo, Legislativo y Judicial de Irak por no cumplir con su responsabilidad en la lucha contra la corrupción y ha instado a estos tres órganos a aplicar las reformas reales en el país.
En este contexto, el clérigo iraquí ha aseverado que los partidos gobernantes deben cambiar la forma en que abordan los problemas de la nación.
A continuación, ha llamado al Gobierno a cumplir sus deberes para aliviar el sufrimiento del pueblo iraquí, combatir la corrupción y crear nuevos empleos para los jóvenes.
Desde el martes, una ola de protestas se ha desencadenado en Bagdad cuando los manifestantes iraquíes se congregaron en la plaza Tahrir para protestar en contra de la corrupción, del desempleo y de los problemas existentes en los servicios públicos.
Sin embargo, ciertas personas han desviado de su curso pacífico las protestas que se han tornado violentas convirtiéndose en choques entre un grupo de manifestantes y policías iraquíes.
LEER MÁS: https://www.hispantv.com/noticias/irak/439333/tuits-arabia-saudi-protestas-manifestacion
LEER MÁS: https://www.hispantv.com/noticias/irak/439263/toque-queda-bagdad-manifestantes-protestas
Ante esta coyuntura, algunos medios occidentales y árabes, en particular de Arabia Saudí, exageran las protestas con la intención de sacar provecho político de la situación, alentar la violencia en el país árabe y acusar a las fuerzas de las Unidades de Movilización Popular (Al-Hashad Al-Shabi, en árabe) de reprimir a los manifestantes.
Dichas fuerzas populares básicamente fueron organizadas para luchar contra el grupo terrorista EIIL (Daesh, en árabe), un deber realizado perfectamente durante la lucha de este país contra el flagelo del terrorismo, y no tienen misión alguna para realizar medidas en las protestas.
El grupo de HispanTV les recuerda a los seguidores de nuestra página en Youtube de que en el caso de que no se suban nuevos vídeos, en 48 horas, esto significa que han bloqueado el acceso de este canal a su cuenta en YouTube. De ser así, haga Clic en el siguiente enlace para obtener nuestra nueva dirección en YouTube:
http://htv.mx/kHn
https://www.hispantv.com
https://www.facebook.com/HispanTV
https://twitter.com/HispanTV
https://www.hispantv.com/distribucion
https://www.hispantv.com/directo
https://vk.com/HispanTV
2m:24s
3065
[2Oct19] Daesh ayuda a Arabia Saudí en su agresión contra Yemen - Spanish
Las fuerzas yemeníes han encontrado nuevas pruebas que revelan la participación de los grupos terroristas en la devastadora agresión saudí...
Las fuerzas yemeníes han encontrado nuevas pruebas que revelan la participación de los grupos terroristas en la devastadora agresión saudí contra Yemen.
El grupo de HispanTV les recuerda a los seguidores de nuestra página en Youtube de que en el caso de que no se suban nuevos vídeos, en 48 horas, esto significa que han bloqueado el acceso de este canal a su cuenta en YouTube. De ser así, haga Clic en el siguiente enlace para obtener nuestra nueva dirección en YouTube:
http://htv.mx/kHn
https://www.hispantv.com
https://www.facebook.com/HispanTV
https://twitter.com/HispanTV
https://www.hispantv.com/distribucion
https://www.hispantv.com/directo
https://vk.com/HispanTV
2m:3s
2612
10 Minutos: Acoso Sexual en Capitolio de EEUU - Jan 2018 - Spanish
El acoso sexual en el Congreso de Estados Unidos no es un problema de un solo partido ya que los acosadores sexuales son de todas las tendencias...
El acoso sexual en el Congreso de Estados Unidos no es un problema de un solo partido ya que los acosadores sexuales son de todas las tendencias políticas e involucra tanto a demócratas como a republicanos, sin que nadie trate de descubrir la causa.
Parece que el escándalo sexual en el Capitolio se ha convertido en una herramienta para fines políticos.
Nuevos informes muestran que durante los últimos 20 años el gobierno ha pagado más de 17 millones de dólares del dinero de los contribuyentes para resolver los alegatos de acoso sexual y otras violaciones laborales protagonizados por los propios empleados del Congreso de Estados Unidos.
Por otro lado, para aquellos que sufren acoso, existe el temor constante de que su reputación quede manchada.
Un análisis de 2015 sobre las quejas ante la Comisión para la Igualdad de Oportunidades en el Empleo (EEOC, por su sigla en inglés) muestra que el 75 por ciento de las mujeres que presentan denuncias sobre el acoso, sufren represalia; un verdadero temor en el Capitolio.
10m:21s
3034
[May 2018] 10 Minutos: Mohamed Bin Salman en EEUU - Spanish
En marzo de 2018, todas las miradas estaban puestas en el príncipe heredero saudí, Mohamad Bin Salman, quien hizo su primera visita a Estados...
En marzo de 2018, todas las miradas estaban puestas en el príncipe heredero saudí, Mohamad Bin Salman, quien hizo su primera visita a Estados Unidos, después de lograr un punto de apoyo dentro del reino. La visita fue una respuesta a la bienvenida real saudí recibida por Donald Trump.
10m:43s
3137
Líder Supremo insta a implementar reformas estructurales en la ONU -...
Irán celebra hoy viernes el segundo día de la reunión de los jefes de Estado y de Gobierno de la XVI Cumbre del Movimiento No Alineado...
Irán celebra hoy viernes el segundo día de la reunión de los jefes de Estado y de Gobierno de la XVI Cumbre del Movimiento No Alineado (MNA). La cita fue inaugurada ayer jueves por El Líder Supremo de la Revolución Islámica de Irán, el ayatolá Seyed Ali Jamenei. La necesidad de reformas en la estructura de las Naciones Unidas ha sido uno de los principales temas abordados en esta reunión.
http://www.hispantv.com
http://www.facebook.com/Hispantv
http://hispantv.com/Frequencies.aspx
3m:1s
5889
[May 2018] 10 Minutos: Elecciones parlamentarias en Irak - Spanish
El próximo 12 de mayo alrededor de 24 millones de iraquíes podrán ejercer su derecho a voto para elegir a los miembros del Parlamento, quienes a...
El próximo 12 de mayo alrededor de 24 millones de iraquíes podrán ejercer su derecho a voto para elegir a los miembros del Parlamento, quienes a su vez elegirán al próximo presidente y al primer ministro de Irak. Casi 7000 candidatos compiten por 329 escaños.
Los ganadores de estos comicios a nivel nacional enfrentarán la abrumadora tarea de la reconstrucción de Irak tras una guerra de tres años contra el grupo terrorista EIIL (Daesh, en árabe) y una lucha contra la corrupción que está agotando sus ingresos petroleros.
10m:9s
2880
HispanTV emite entrevista del general Soleimani sobre guerra de 33 días...
El comandante de las Fuerzas de Quds del CGRI, el general de brigada Qasem Soleimani, explica en una entrevista las realidades no contadas sobre la...
El comandante de las Fuerzas de Quds del CGRI, el general de brigada Qasem Soleimani, explica en una entrevista las realidades no contadas sobre la guerra de los 33 días.
Reportero: En el nombre de Dios, el Misericordioso. Le damos la bienvenida y le agradecemos su presencia. Son días de luto por el Señor de los Mártires (P) Le rogamos a Dios que acepte su duelo.
La Oficina de Preservación y Difusión de las Obras del Líder de la Revolución Islámica tiene la labor de explicar y difundir las opiniones del Ayatolá Jamenei sobre diversos temas. Con este fin, se mantienen diálogos con varios funcionarios y eminentes pensadores en diversos campos. Una de las cuestiones importantes que se han planteado también en nuestras conversaciones con el secretario general de Hezbolá en El Líbano es el tema de la guerra de los 33 días. Esta guerra se ha convertido en el origen de los cambios en la región y el frente de resistencia.
Hoy tenemos el honor de encontrarnos con usted como Comandante de la Fuerza de Al-Quds y la persona que participó personalmente en la batalla durante esta guerra para escuchar su análisis sobre este gran evento.
Desde luego, usted no ha tenido entrevistas de prensa como comandante de las Fuerzas de Al-Quds. Esta será, si Dios quiere, su primera conversación con la prensa después de veinte años.
Como primera pregunta comenzamos con el análisis de las razones preliminares de la guerra de los 33 días, en particular después de cinco años de la presencia de Estados Unidos en la región, principalmente en Irak y Afganistán
Les comento que en la guerra de los 33 días existían ciertos temas ocultos que en realidad fueron las principales causas de la guerra. Algunos de ellos eran claros y evidentes. En realidad, eran una excusa para que el régimen pudiera llevar a cabo sus metas en secreto, en un momento concreto. Aunque cuando digo que eran ocultas, en realidad, nosotros conocíamos las intenciones del régimen. Pero lo que no sabíamos era que el enemigo pretendía realizar un ataque sorpresa.
Después de analizar una serie de situaciones llegamos a esa conclusión, antes del comienzo de la guerra… era que pretendía realizar un ataque rápido y por sorpresa Y que en este ataque por sorpresa, Hezbolá sería eliminado. Está guerra se produjo en una situación en la que transcurrían dos sucesos importantes Uno relacionado con toda la zona y otro, con el régimen sionista en especial, en lo relacionado con la situación de la zona. En primer lugar, EEUU, gracias a los ataques del 11 de septiembre, había conseguido ampliar su presencia militar en nuestra zona.
Algo similar había ocurrido en la Segunda Guerra Mundial. Aunque, con respecto a la Segunda Guerra Mundial, no era comprable ni en calidad ni cantidad.
Esto ocurrió por primera vez en los ataques de Sadam a Kuwait en 1991, que conllevó al ataque de EEUU. También ese ataque de EEUU y la derrota de Sadam hicieron que dejasen sus armas en nuestra región. Y, en consecuencia, los estadounidenses colocaron sus bases. Pero, después del 11 de septiembre, Debido a dos grandes ataques que EE.UU. realizó aproximadamente un 40 por ciento de sus fuerzas armadas entraron directamente en nuestra zona. Después con el paso del tiempo, y debido a una serie de cambios, las fuerzas de reserva y la guardia nacional también llegaron a la zona Es decir, aproximadamente, el 60 por ciento del Ejército de EE.UU. Esto quiere decir que todas sus fuerzas, las internas y las foráneas, penetraron en nuestra zona
Por lo tanto, teníamos una presencia a gran escala en una pequeña zona, En Irak, alrededor de 150 mil soldados y en Afganistán había más de 30 mil soldados norteamericanos.
Aparte de eso, también, estaban presentes en Afganistán casi 15 mil soldados de las fuerzas de la Alianza. Por lo tanto, teníamos casi a 200 mil soldados entrenados en nuestra zona… junto a Palestina. Bueno, esta situación, generaba una serie de oportunidades para el régimen sionista.
Es decir, que la presencia de los estadounidenses en Irak impedía el movimiento de los sirios en Siria. También era considerada una amenaza para el Gobierno de Siria.
Historia Completa: http://htv.mx/1EBH
El grupo de HispanTV les recuerda a los seguidores de nuestra página en Youtube de que en el caso de que no se suban nuevos vídeos, en 48 horas, esto significa que han bloqueado el acceso de este canal a su cuenta en YouTube. De ser así, haga Clic en el siguiente enlace para obtener nuestra nueva dirección en YouTube:
http://htv.mx/kHn
https://www.hispantv.com
https://www.facebook.com/HispanTV
https://twitter.com/HispanTV
https://www.hispantv.com/distribucion
https://www.hispantv.com/directo
https://vk.com/HispanTV
60m:43s
3869
[02/11/15] Gran eco mundial de la marcha de hoy en Irán - Spanish
La masiva participación de los iraníes en las marchas celebradas este miércoles con motivo del trigésimo sexto aniversario de la victoria de la...
La masiva participación de los iraníes en las marchas celebradas este miércoles con motivo del trigésimo sexto aniversario de la victoria de la Revolución Islámica de Irán ha tenido una gran resonancia en los medios de comunicación extranjeros.
La agencia estadounidense de noticias \\\'Associated Press\\\' ha destacado que la nación persa ha celebrado el aniversario de la victoria de su revolución con multitudinarias marchas en diferentes ciudades del país en las que se han gritado eslóganes contra EE.UU. y el régimen de Israel.
“El presidente del país, Hasan Rohani durante su discurso ante miles de participantes en la manifestación (en la ciudad capitalina de Teherán) ha reiterado que pondrá todo su empeño en salvaguardar los derechos de la República Islámica de Irán en los diálogos nucleares con los grandes poderes”, ha subrayado.
Asimismo, la cadena televisiva de Al-Jazeera de Catar ha resaltado el aspecto regional del discurso del mandatario persa, manifestando que “Hasan Rohani ha reiterado que Irán siempre ha sido pionero en brindar apoyo a países como Irak, Siria, El Líbano y Yemen que están luchando contra el terrorismo”.
También, el periódico australiano Sun Herald, en su reportaje, ha considerado la participación masiva de la nación persa en las movilizaciones como demostración del poder del pueblo ante las sanciones occidentales impuestas a su país con la excusa de su programa nuclear.
Otro medio de comunicación que ha dado cobertura a este gran evento es la cadena estadounidense NBC que ha expresado su descontento por los eslóganes antiestadounidenses que dominaban el ambiente de manifestaciones de este miércoles “a pesar de aligeramiento de los embargos contra Irán”.
NBC, a continuación, ha calificado de importantes las marchas del 11 de febrero en Irán teniendo en cuenta que la Revolución Islámica fue el acontecimiento que marcó las relaciones entre el país persa y EE.UU., pues el pueblo derrocó al régimen Pahlavi, apoyado por las autoridades norteamericanas de ese tiempo y “las relaciones siguen siendo hostiles desde entonces”.
La agencia noticiera china, Xinhua, a su vez, ha reflejado la participación multitudinaria de los iraníes en los acontecimientos de este miércoles destacando los eslóganes de “abajo EE.UU.” y “abajo Israel” que hacían temblar las calles de varias ciudades del país.
¡Suscríbete a HispanTV!
https://www.youtube.com/user/hispantv...
El grupo de HispanTV les recuerda a los seguidores de nuestra página en Youtube de que en el caso de que no se suban nuevos vídeos, en 48 horas, esto significa que han bloqueado el acceso de este canal a su cuenta en YouTube. De ser así, haga Clic en el siguiente enlace para obtener nuestra nueva dirección en YouTube:
http://www.hispantv.com/detail.aspx?i...
http://www.hispantv.com
http://www.facebook.com/HispanTV
http://plus.google.com/+HispanTV
http://hispantv.com/Frequencies.aspx
http://hispantv.com/Live.aspx
http://twitter.com/HispanTV
http://vk.com/HispanTV
2m:33s
4399
[05Oct19] Detrás de la Razón: Islamofobia; una de las políticas de...
En Estados Unidos hay una fuerte tensión hacia los musulmanes. Una postura que se ha incrementado abiertamente en la Administración de Donald...
En Estados Unidos hay una fuerte tensión hacia los musulmanes. Una postura que se ha incrementado abiertamente en la Administración de Donald Trump.
El inquilino de la Casa Blanca ha puesto cuesta arriba el ingreso de ciudadanos de países de mayoría musulmana a territorio estadounidense.
En agosto de 2019, el Departamento de Educación de Estados Unidos amenazó con retirar los fondos a un programa conjunto para estudios sobre Oriente Medio. Acusó a la Universidad de Carolina del Norte y a la Universidad de Duke de utilizar de mala forma los fondos federales y mostrar un sesgo pro-Islam.
Efectos de la islamofobia:
Según el diario estadounidense The Washington Post, Actualmente, el 98 % los musulmanes que solicitan visados tiene respuesta negativa y siguiendo con las cifras el número de visas para musulmanes bajó de 1419 en 2017, a 69 en el periodo 2018-2019.
La estrategia de Washington ha generado que uno de cada cinco ciudadanos, el 22 por ciento de la población, cree que los dueños de negocios y empresas pequeñas en Estados Unidos deben tener permiso para negarse a atender a los musulmanes. Esto fue revelado en un estudio del Instituto Público de Investigación de Religión (PRRI, por sus siglas en ingles) en agosto de este año. Así de claro operan las políticas de odio en EE.UU.
Por: Osvaldo Canales.
El grupo de HispanTV les recuerda a los seguidores de nuestra página en Youtube de que en el caso de que no se suban nuevos vídeos, en 48 horas, esto significa que han bloqueado el acceso de este canal a su cuenta en YouTube. De ser así, haga Clic en el siguiente enlace para obtener nuestra nueva dirección en YouTube:
http://htv.mx/kHn
https://www.hispantv.com
https://www.facebook.com/HispanTV
https://twitter.com/HispanTV
https://www.hispantv.com/distribucion
https://www.hispantv.com/directo
https://vk.com/HispanTV
25m:34s
3318
[11/21/2017] Irán: Victoria del eje de la Resistencia contra Daesh -...
El Cuerpo de Guardianes de la Revolución Islámica informa al Líder iraní de la victoria de la Resistencia en la lucha contra el EIIL....
El Cuerpo de Guardianes de la Revolución Islámica informa al Líder iraní de la victoria de la Resistencia en la lucha contra el EIIL.
El comandante de las Fuerzas de Quds del Cuerpo de Guardianes de la Revolución Islámica (CGRI), el general Qasem Soleimani, en un importante mensaje enviado hoy martes al Líder de la Revolución Islámica, el ayatolá Seyed Ali Jamenei, ha informado de la victoria de los combatientes del eje de Resistencia en su lucha contra el grupo terrorista EIIL (Daesh, en árabe) en Siria.
“Le informo humildemente del fin de la operación para la liberación de la ciudad de Abu Kamal, último feudo de Daesh en Siria, con la retirada de la bandera de este grupo estadounidense-sionista y su sustitución por la bandera de Siria”, ha señalado el general Soleimani.
En su nota destaca, por una parte, el liderazgo y las directrices del máximo clérigo chií de Irak, el gran ayatolá Seyed Ali Sistani, y, por otra, la resistencia de las Fuerzas Armadas de Siria e Irak, en especial, de las fuerzas populares de Al-Hashad Al-Shabi. También el determinante papel del Movimiento de Resistencia Islámica de El Líbano (Hezbolá) y de su secretario general, Seyed Hasan Nasrolá, y el coraje de los jóvenes musulmanes que desempeñaron un rol definitivo a la hora de encarar dicho “envenenado huracán”.
También ha mencionado los crímenes de lesa humanidad perpetrados por los terroristas, su brutalidad, sus acciones violentas y el alto nivel de destrucción que han provocado en los últimos seis años en “dos países muy influyentes del mundo islámico” con el objetivo de crear lo que califican de estado Islámico de Irak y el Levante.
Le informo humildemente del fin de la operación para la liberación de la ciudad de Abu Kamal, último feudo de Daesh en Siria, con la retirada de la bandera de este grupo estadounidense-sionista y su sustitución por la bandera de Siria”, ha señalado el general Qasem Soleimani, comandante de las Fuerzas de Quds del Cuerpo de Guardianes de la Revolución Islámica (CGRI).
Israel reconoce que Al-Asad gana la guerra contra terroristas | HISPANTV
El ministro israelí para asuntos militares, Avigdor Lieberman, reconoce que Siria ha ganado la lucha contra el grupo terrorista EIIL (Daesh, en árabe).
“Líderes y organizaciones vinculados con Estados Unidos diseñaron al detalle los crímenes perpetrados por los extremistas takfiríes, tal como han confesado las máximas autoridades estadounidenses”, ha apostillado.
En la última parte de su mensaje al Líder de Irán, ha felicitado esta gran victoria tanto al ayatolá Jamenei como a la nación de Irán, amén de a los pueblos reprimidos de Irak y Siria y a los musulmanes del mundo.
El general Soleimani desempeñó un papel crucial en los duros combates del domingo para hacerse con el total control de la ciudad de Abu Kamal, la última urbe que controlaba Daesh en el este de Siria, en la provincia oriental de Deir Ezzor, fronteriza con Irak, por lo que, además, se cierra el acceso de los terroristas a las fronteras con Irak.
Desde el inicio de las crisis de Irak y Siria, la República Islámica de Irán ha apoyado a los Gobiernos y las naciones de Irak y Siria con asesoría militar por solicitud de Bagdad y Damasco, respectivamente, y asegura que seguirá ayudando a sus vecinos hasta la derrota total del terrorismo en la región.
2m:1s
5093